Press Council Bill: Media Professional Groups Expose Unconstitutional Moves By National Assembly To Kill Press Freedom In Nigeria

linkedin sharing button
The media professional groups, under the auspices of Nigerian Press Organisation (NPO) have rejected the proposed amendment bill of the Nigerian Press Council (NPC) by the National Assembly, describing it as unconstitutional.
The NPO kicked against the undemocratic bill which was considered during a public hearing on Thursday by the House Committee on Information, Culture, Ethics and Values.

Nigeria Press Organisation (NPO) is the umbrella body, comprising of the Newspapers Proprietors Association of Nigeria (NPAN), the Nigerian Guild of Editors (NGE) and the Nigerian Union of Journalists (NUJ).

In their submission at public hearing, NPO said some aspect of the bill are in total violation of press freedom in Nigeria.

a member of the NPO delegation, Azu Ishiekwene, said almost half of the 39 clauses in the bill contained unconstitutional regulations, which run contrary to the democratic tenets of virile journalism practice in the country.

He reminded the House that some of the obnoxious clauses smuggled into the amendment bill NPO are already before the Supreme court, and therefore renders the amendment efforts to nullity with smacks of court contempt on those issues raised.

“It is a matter that has been pending in court since 1999 but the first decisive ruling in the matter came in 2010 when the high court ruled that 17 out of the 39 clauses in the bill were unconstitutional,” he said.

“The federal government appeal and got a ruling in December 2010. That ruling was again appealed by the NPO and it is pending at the supreme court.

“If you make a law now that binds the hands of the legislation or tilts the legislation one way or the order you are preempting the outcome of what the court is going to do.”

Other critical stakeholders at the hearing also spoke about how the proposed amendment does not give room for the courts to consider some cases before “highly punitive measures are” are taken by the council.

According to Lanre Arogundade, executive director of IPC, “the provision of 3 (d) constitutes a potential threat to press freedom and media survival as it does not provide for judicial intervention before highly punitive measures are handed down by the council and indeed could be used as a political weapon against the media.

“The section provides for penalties and fines against violation of the press code by print media houses and media practitioners, including revocation of license.

“Section 17 (3) (a) & (b) provides that a journalist could be held liable for the offence committed by his or her organisation and can be made to pay a fine of N250,000.

Arogundade added that another “punitive” clause is in section 21 (5) (a) whose amendment is such that “a journalist can be punished by the council even after he/she might have been found guilty by a court of law and without the council going back to the court to report continued infringement.”

“Section 33 (3) and (4) does not give room for retraction or apology where a fake news is mistakenly published but recommends a blanket sanction of up to N10 million or closure for a period of one year,” he said.

However, Francis Nwosu, executive-secretary of the NPC, commended the amendment of the bill and recommended that the council should also be empowered to regulate online print media.

995×250

995×250
Cool to share to any social media. Click preferred icon to share

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *